Gasiorowski v. Hose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence showing doctor’s epidural privileges were suspended from July 1989 until September 1990 was relevant as habit evidence that he improperly administered an epidural in April 1988
• explaining an abuse of discretion must result in demonstrable prejudice to a complaining party to be considered reversible error
• other similar incidents relevant to show defendant physician had habit or routine practice of threading epidural catheters to excessive depth
• “Exclusion of evidence, though improper, is not grounds for reversal if ‘in all probability its admission 6 TONDU, et al. v. STATE FARM Decision of the Court would not have changed the result.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-08-05· cited 120×
• Yauch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-02-29· cited 50×
• Taeger v. CATHOLIC FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVS.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-06-17· cited 43×
• Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Byers
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-05-15· cited 40×
• State v. Slover
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-02-09· cited 31×
• Ogden v. J.M. Steel Erecting, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-05-31· cited 21×
• Stafford v. Burns
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-01-17· cited 18×
• Salopek v. Friedman
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-06-04· cited 16×
• Kita v. Borough of Lindenwold
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-10-14· cited 10×
• Rasor v. Northwest Hospital, LLC Dba Northwest Medical Center
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-05-17· cited 9×
• Miller v. Kelly
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-01-30· cited 6×
• Salopek v. Friedman
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-06-04· cited 1×
• Cb v. Sabalos Ex Rel. County of Pima
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-06-13
• State of Arizona v. Robert Leeroy Slover
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-02-09
• FRED MILLER M.D., Et Ux. v. LUZ BARRERA, MUTUAL INSURANCE CO
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-01-30
• Stafford v. Burns
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-11-29
• Matthew Holmes v. Miranda Pomeroy
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2021-05-07
• Kuhn v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-12-10

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Selby v. Savard
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-11-18· cited 88×
• Purcell v. Zimbelman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-07-20· cited 75×
• John F. Loughan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, John F. Loughan, Cross-Appellee v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, Cross-Appellant
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-01-10· cited 65×
• Schwartz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-10-23· cited 60×
• Helen J. Stoleson v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-05-20· cited 53×
• Czarnecki v. Volkswagen of America
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-12-31· cited 31×
• Graham v. Vegetable Oil Products Company
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-04-28· cited 25×
• Semple v. Tri-City Drywall, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-10-08· cited 10×
• Wetherill v. University of Chicago
  N.D. Illinois· 1983-08-23· cited 6×
• Youngblood v. Austin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-03-09· cited 4×