Skip to main content
· 3/6/2002

Gasch v. Harris

Citations

  • 808 So. 2d 1260
  • 2002 WL 342049

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the substitution of one vehicle for another on an existing policy did not require a new UM selection form
  • noting that substituting automobiles is a renewal of an existing policy
  • noting that substituting automobiles is a renewal of an existing policy
  • new rejection not required upon substitution of vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.