Garza Vega v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, if hypothetically correct jury charge for case would authorize jury to convict on alternative theories of liability, reviewing court must deem evidence sufficient if sufficient under any theory of liability
• concluding that, if hypothetically correct jury charge for case would authorize jury to convict on alternative theories of liability, reviewing court must deem evidence sufficient if sufficient under any theory of liability
• “it is irrelevant in a sufficiency review that the application paragraph of the charge actually given erroneously applied only the law of parties under § 7.02(a)(2
• if hypothetically correct jury charge would authorize jury to convict on alternative theories of liability, evidence is sufficient if it is sufficient under either theory of liability
• ―If the hypothetically correct jury charge for the case would authorize the jury to convict on alternative theories of liability, then the appellate court must deem the evidence sufficient if it is sufficient under any of the theories of liability.‖
• “If the hypothetically correct jury charge for the case would authorize the jury to convict on alternative theories of liability, then the appellate court must deem the evidence sufficient if it is sufficient under any of the theories of liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).