Garza v. Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court need not consider how bifurcation would remedy plaintiff’s roadblocks in seeking class certification when plaintiff never proposed such an option
• noting that bifurcation might serve \as a remedy for the obstacles preventing a finding of predominance\ but that the plaintiffs had not made such a proposal to the district court
• noting that bifurcation might serve “as a remedy for the obstacles pre- venting a finding of predominance” but that the plaintiffs had not made such a proposal to the district court
• finding that plaintiffs’ damages claims were not subject to any formulaic calculation be cause (1) “each ... plaintiff suffered different alleged periods and magnitudes of exposure ... and different alleged symptoms”; (2
• noting that bifurcation might serve “as a remedy for the obstacles preventing a finding of predominance” but that the plaintiffs had not made such a proposal to the district court
• analyzing Watson v. Shell Oil Co., 979 F.2d 1014, 1017-18, 1024 & n.9 (5th Cir. 1992)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).