Skip to main content
· 3/14/2006

Garza v. Prolithic Energy Co., L.P.

Citations

  • 195 S.W.3d 137
  • 2006 WL 168066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on “at least” one-eighth royalty clause to construe interest as a fraction‑of‑royalty interest
  • the court noted that the reservation in a deed of the various attributes of a severed mineral estate would have been “redundant” if only a royalty interest was conveyed
  • the phrase “in and under” refers to a mineral interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone, Angelini, Simmons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.