· 3/14/2006
Garza v. Prolithic Energy Co., L.P.
Citations
- 195 S.W.3d 137
- 2006 WL 168066
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relying on “at least” one-eighth royalty clause to construe interest as a fraction‑of‑royalty interest
- the court noted that the reservation in a deed of the various attributes of a severed mineral estate would have been “redundant” if only a royalty interest was conveyed
- the phrase “in and under” refers to a mineral interest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stone, Angelini, Simmons
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.