Garza v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘[w]here the appellant in the appellate court fails to raise an issue in that court, this court will not address it’ ”
• it is well established that when a statute defines the very terms it uses, those terms must be construed according to the definitions contained in the act
• “ ‘[w]here the appellant in the appellate court fails to raise an issue in that court, this court will not address it’ ”
• it is well established that when a statute defines the very terms it uses, those terms must be construed according to the definitions contained in the act
• in cases involving manufacturers or distributors-lessors, two categories of sellers with two different limitations periods, the earlier of the 10- or 12-year repose period in section 13-213(b) is to be applied to determine whether the product liablity claim was timely filed
• in cases involving manufacturers or distributors-lessors, two categories of sellers with two different limitations periods, the earlier of the 10- or 12-year repose period in section 13 — 213(b) is to be applied to determine whether the product liablity claim was timely filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).