Garza v. Cole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when trial court errs in “admit[ting] evidence of a nature that is largely repetitious” of other testimony, error is harmless
• where trial court errs in “admit[ting] evidence of a nature that is largely repetitious” of other testimony, error harmless
• generally, trial court has broad discretion regarding admissibility of evidence of experiments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).