Garza v. Arizona Refining Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding substantial evidence of malice when the defendant knowingly consumed multiple impairing substances, swerved off the road prior to the collision, failed to brake, failed to call 911, did not aid the two victims he struck, and registered a 0.16 BAC at the time of the accident
• “our appellate courts have also upheld the admission of evidence of a defendant’s pending charge for DWI to show malice when the circumstances surrounding the pending charge were sufficiently similar to those surrounding the charged offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).