Skip to main content
· 6/29/2015

Gary Woolbright v. Cookie Crews

Citations

  • 791 F.3d 628
  • 2015 FED App. 0132P
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11043
  • 2015 WL 3939382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the “strong Kentucky preference for [ineffective assistance] claims to be presented” in Rule 11.42 motions
  • “When a petitioner has failed to fairly present … claims to the state courts and no state remedy remains, [the] claims are considered to be procedurally defaulted.”
  • “When a petitioner has failed to fairly present … claims to the state courts and no state remedy remains, [the] claims are considered to be procedurally defaulted.”
  • “When a petitioner has failed to fairly present … claims to the state courts and no state remedy remains, [the] claims are considered to be procedurally defaulted.”
  • “When a petitioner has failed to fairly present … claims to the state courts and no state remedy remains, [the] claims are considered to be procedurally defaulted.”
  • “When a petitioner has failed to fairly present … claims to the state courts and no state remedy remains, [the] claims are considered to be procedurally defaulted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Siler, Rogers, Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.