Gary W. Bowen v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim for military back pay accrued when the service member was informed that the Army considered him released from active duty, and when he ceased receiving military pay from the Army
• explaining that where service is ordered and directed by a state, it is not qualifying federal service under SCRA’s predecessor statute
• construing predecessor act, Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940
• Two-week training of Air National Guard officer was not “active duty” and thus could not constitute “military service” under the predecessor statute of the SCRA, the SSCRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).