Gary Vander Boegh v. EnergySolutions, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a litigant abandoned an argument because the litigant failed to fully develop it
• holding that an applicant was not an “employee” under § 3730(h)’s plain meaning
• explaining that a cause of action is presumed to lie outside the court’s limited jurisdiction, and “[t]he burden of establishing the contrary rests upon the party asserting jurisdiction”
• noting that an appellant abandons an argument by failing to “fully develop” it
• observing that a failure to fully develop an argument constitutes abandonment
• explaining that perfunctory and undeveloped arguments are waived on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).