Gary v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in C.D.G., “in order to avoid collateral estoppel, it was necessary for the claimant to present new facts of a change in his condition or a change in the increase of his pain”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).