Gary v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding probation officer’s hearsay testimony, that probationer’s daughter stated probationer did not live at residence, insufficient— alone — to support change of residence violation
• finding “[t]he fact that the probation officer did not find [appellant] at home when she visited did not prove that [appellant] had moved” and “the hearsay statement attributed to [appellant’s] daughter ... standing alone, was insufficient to support the revocation”
• “The fact that the probation officer did not find Gary at home when she visited did not prove that Gary had moved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gene E. Rutland v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-26· cited 6×
• Smith-Curles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-22· cited 5×
• Mullins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-09-11
• Allen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-01-04
• Bryant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-01-17
• Royal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-12

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lawson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-10-25· cited 74×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-10· cited 26×
• Crawford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-22· cited 6×
• Valente v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-23· cited 2×