Gary v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding when a statute requires the filing of a document, it is considered filed when delivered to and received by the proper officer
• “When a statute requires the filing of a paper or document, it is filed when delivered to and received by the proper officer.”
• Counsel should be appointed when the State moves for dismissal on the ground the application was not timely filed where the applicant raises an issue of material fact regarding the applicability of the one-year statute of limitation.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pelzer v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-06-05· cited 12×
• Cretzmeyer Ex Rel. Estate of Cretzmeyer v. Bloch
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-20· cited 9×
• Richardson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-03-24· cited 5×
• Mose v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-08-16· cited 4×
• Tucker v. Rushton
  D. South Carolina· 2009-07-10

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Burnett v. New York Central Railroad
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,036×
• Al-Shabazz v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-14· cited 168×
• Palacio v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-18· cited 42×
• Whitehead v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-12-14· cited 12×
• Fox v. UNION-BUFFALO MILLS
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1955-03-10· cited 10×