Gary v. Fed. Trade Comm'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that errors in investigation “were so severe or persistent as to support an inference of intentional or reckless conduct that violated a plaintiff’s constitutional rights”
• noting that errors in investigation “were so severe or persistent as to support an inference of intentional or reckless conduct that violated a plaintiff’s constitutional rights”
• differentiating between legal opinions as opposed to opinions that merely have \direct implications for applying legal standards\
• “In constitutional tort cases, expert testimony regarding sound professional standards governing a defendant’s actions can be relevant and helpful.”
• “It is the role of the judge, not an expert witness, to instruct the jury on the applicable principles of law . . . .”
• “As a general rule, [ ] an expert may not offer a legal opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).