GARY SCOTT STROUD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an administrative judge abused his discretion in admitting the testimony of a physician that the worker suffered from multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS
• concluding that expert testimony concerning medical diagnosis and causation should be subject to Lanigan analysis
• noting that the judge’s “gate keeping function ... is the same regardless of the nature of the methodology used”
• applying Daubert-Lanigan analysis to “expert testimony based on, inter alia, personal observations and clinical experience”
• supplanting Commonwealth s. Vao Sok, 425 Mass. 787, 797 [1997], after the Supreme Court rejected de nova review of such determinations in General Elec. Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 141-143 [1997]
• reviewing admission of testimony at suppression hearing for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).