Gary Murphy, Cross-Appellee v. City of Flagler Beach, and Daniel H. Bennett, Cross-Appellants. Gary Murphy v. Flagler Beach, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• standing alone, the fact that \a defendant has consulted with his attorney is of no probative value as to issues of good faith in attempting to meet Constitutional or other legal requirements\
• “The purposes of the contemporaneous objection and proffer requirements of Fed. R. Evid. 103(a
• “The purposes of the contemporaneous objection and proffer requirements of Fed. R. Evid. 103(a
• “The purposes of the contemporaneous objection and proffer requirements of Fed. R. Evid. 103(a
• after police chief fired the plaintiff ex-police officer, assertedly for leaving the city limits while on duty, evidence that the chief and other officers regularly left the city limits while on duty was relevant to the chiefs state of mind to show that reason was pre-textual

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).