Gary Michael Becker, Sr. v. Chevron Chemical Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that work to replace overhead walkways was essential to Chevron’s business
• \[t]he fact that this work might be considered extraordinary construction work . . . is irrelevant under the amended version of 23:1061[]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).