Skip to main content
· 3/5/2003

Gary Littlejohn v. United States

Citations

  • 321 F.3d 915
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1984
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3890
  • 2003 WL 730153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding issue preclusion inappropriate when party did not have “the opportunity to fully litigate” issue in prior proceeding
  • setting forth standard of review and requirements for claim preclusion and issue preclusion
  • “[T]he Federal Circuit [is] the only Article III court with jurisdiction to hear challenges to 14 VA determinations regarding disability benefits.”
  • “[T]he Federal Circuit [is] the only Article III court with jurisdiction to hear challenges to 10 VA determinations regarding disability benefits.”
  • collateral estoppel prevents re-litigation of all issues of fact or law that were actually litigated and necessarily decided in a prior proceeding
  • “Claim preclusion prevents the relitigation of claims previously tried and decided.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beezer, Nelson, Wardlaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.