Gary Lackey, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that infirmities in the foreclosure proceedings would not support a quiet title claim
• noting that the Eighth Circuit and “courts nationally” have “consistently rejected” the theory that an assignee or other successor must have physical possession of the note in order to foreclose (collecting cases)
• “Because Freddie Mac is a party to this case, the district court had original jurisdiction pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1452(f)”
• “Because Freddie Mac is a party to this case, the district court had original jurisdiction pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1452(f).”
• “Because Freddie Mac is a party to this case, the district court had original jurisdiction pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1452(f)”
• “Because Freddie Mac is a party to this case, the district court had original jurisdiction pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1452(f)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).