Gary L. Rinehimer v. Cemcolift, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an impairment lasting seven months was of too brief a duration to be a disability under the ADA
• holding employer did not regard employee as disabled where employer thought employee suffered from pneumonia, which is a temporary condition not protected by the ADA
• holding employer did not regard employee as disabled where employer thought employee suffered from pneumonia, which is a temporary condition not protected by the ADA
• holding employer did not regard employee as disabled where employer thought employee suffered from pneumonia, which is a temporary condition not protected by the ADA
• stating that “[w]hen a ruling on the admission of evidence implicates the interpretation of a legal standard . . . our review is plenary.”
• explaining that the PHRA mimics the ADA and ADEA and so no separate analysis is required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).