Skip to main content
· 11/3/2004

Gary Herron v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation

Citations

  • 388 F.3d 293
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22785
  • 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,813
  • 94 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1219
  • 2004 WL 2453755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a two-month delay in overtime payment was not an adverse employment action
  • concluding that empr's disciplinary action for performance issues was \normal workplace friction\
  • holding that plaintiff who per- formed some aspects of his job well, but had a confronta- tional and disrespectful attitude, could not show that he was meeting his employer’s legitimate expectations
  • concluding that empr’s disciplinary action for perfor- mance issues was “normal workplace friction”
  • holding that perceived favoritism of white supervisors was insufficient to state discrimination claim
  • concluding that empr’s disciplinary action for perfor- mance issues was “normal workplace friction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manion, Bauer, Easterbrook, Manton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.