Gary Haggard v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ need not include additional complaints in the hypothetical not supported by substantial evidence
• concluding that, where claimant could cook some meals, water flowers, help his wife paint, watch television, go out for dinner, and occasionally drive car and visit friends, his activities did not support finding of total disability
• holding an ALJ need not include additional complaints in the hypothetical not supported by substantial evidence
• holding an ALJ need not -11- include additional complaints in the hypothetical not supported by substantial evidence
• treating physician’s opinion was not afforded deference where it was not supported by his own findings or diagnostic data
• treating physician’s opinion is not afforded deference where it is not supported by his own findings or diagnostic data

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).