Gary Fields v. Henry County, Tennessee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the 25 plaintiff had not demonstrated an Eighth Amendment violation, stating “[t]he Eighth 26 Amendment’s protections address the amount of bail, not the timing. There is no constitutional 27 right to speedy bail.”
• noting that such a policy could even discourage states from creating their own systems of procedural rights for fear of triggering federal liability
• noting that such a policy could even discourage states from creating their own systems of procedural rights for fear of triggering federal liability
• noting that such a policy could even discourage states from creating their own systems of procedural rights for fear of triggering federal liability
• stating that a successful due process claim requires proof that an individual was- deprived of a life, liberty, or property interest (i.e., a forfeiture) without due process
• quoting, in part, United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321, 334 (1998)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).