Skip to main content
· 2/26/2014

Gary AuBuchon v. Timothy F. Geithner

Citations

  • 743 F.3d 638
  • 2014 WL 715634
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3591
  • 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,027
  • 121 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding acceleration of employee’s work deadlines and assigning extra work to him is not adverse employment action
  • holding that “filing an EEOC complaint” is “protected activity”
  • holding, in the context of a Title VII failure to promote case, it was not an adverse action for an employer to fail to create a position to which the complaining party could be promoted
  • finding the failure to promote was not materially adverse because there was no promotional opportunity available
  • collecting numerous cases with comparable actions to those alleged here where the Eighth Circuit found no adverse employment action
  • stating the failure to “adequately laud” the plaintiff’s job performance was not unlawful retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Beam, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.