Gary Arnett v. Gary T. Myers, Executive Director of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that agency’s physical taking constituted its final, definitive position, but analyzing whether Tennessee had an adequate remedy available to seek compensation
• reasoning that Coeur d’Alene did not bar a suit in part because, even if the plaintiffs prevailed, the property would “remain within the sovereign control of the State of Tennessee” and would “continue to be subject to Tennessee’s regulatory authority”
• “Procedural due process and equal protection claims that are ancillary to taking claims are subject to the same Williamson ripeness requirements.... ”
• “Circumstantial evidence ... may support this inference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).