Skip to main content
· 7/26/2019

Gary Anderson Gillis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting trade secrets claim where the “alleged trade secrets were completely parallel to what was disclosed in . . . published patent applications”
  • “[D]isclosure of a trade secret in a 7 patent application extinguishes the information’s trade secret status.”
  • “[D]isclosure of a trade secret in a patent application extinguishes the information’s trade secret status.”
  • “[D]isclosure of a trade secret in a patent application extinguishes the information’s trade secret status’”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.