Garvin v. Squires

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “nothing prevents the SSA from basing his judgment upon the evaluations and ratings of others”
• “[T]he FAR itself is no longer cause to follow the approach to review taken in the old precedents, which were applying the now-obsolete ‘reasonable chance’ ... standard.”
• An agency must “articulate a satisfactory explanation” for its decision.
• discussing relationship between SSP and evaluation method ultimately employed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).