Garvin v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff’s inability to walk quickly or to walk for over eight (8) hours is not a substantial limitation on a major life activity. Therefore, plaintiff did not fall within the meaning of a “disabled person” pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).