Garvin v. Childers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exclusion of evidence should seldom be granted unless bad faith is involved
• affirming district court’s dismissal, where “a disposition of a Title VII action as untimely filed is a decision on the merits for purposes of res judicata.”
• “[T]he prior judgment in the Title VII suit barred the section 1981 suit against the same parties or their privies.”
• Title VII claim barred later § 1981 claim based on same wrongful termination
• Where two claims “emerge from the same transaction and share precisely the same nucleus of operative facts,” a litigant “may not assert them serially, in successive actions, but must advance all at once on pain of bar.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• prior Title VII claim barred § 1981 claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).