· 9/6/1994
Garvelink v. Detroit News
Citations
- 522 N.W.2d 883
- 206 Mich. App. 604
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- As a matter of law, satirical article could not “reasonably be interpreted as stating actual facts about the plaintiff and ... is, therefore, protected speech.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jansen, McDonald, Hocking
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.