· 2/19/2002
Gartrell v. Ashcroft
Citations
- 191 F. Supp. 2d 23
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2730
- 2002 WL 237318
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is improper for a moving party to introduce new facts or different 1 legal arguments in the reply brief than those presented in the moving papers.”
- “It is improper for a moving party to introduce new facts or different legal arguments in the reply brief than those presented in the moving 26 papers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.