Garth v. Davis & Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing EPA claims where plaintiff alleged no facts “relative to the conclusion that men were paid more than women”
• denying a motion to dismiss a retaliation claim predicated on multiple adverse actions, while holding that certain alleged adverse actions were not materially adverse
• dismissing retaliation claim to extent it was based on constructive discharge, but permitting retaliation claim to proceed as to the plaintiff’s demotion and placement on a PIP
• dismissing claim where plaintiff made only conclusory allegations that male employees were paid more than female employees and failed to allege how her position and that of the comparator were similar
• “New York’s Equal Pay Act is analyzed under the same standards applicable to the federal Equal Pay Act.”
• “How was her position comparable or substantially similar? What responsibilities did they share? Without these facts, courts routinely dismiss EPA claims pled in this formulaic fashion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).