Garstecki v. Assefa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mechanical extrapolation was inappropriate because the court made no findings establishing the children’s specific needs
• holding that minor’s property in a UTMA account cannot be used to reduce a parent’s legal obligation of support
• remanding for additional findings under the statutory factors to support extrapolation when the court had made no findings concerning the child’s specific needs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).