Garry Fuller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that order containing this finality language was clear and 4 unequivocal
• concluding that combination of statements together formed “clear indication of finality”
• stating that “an order is final if it includes a finality phrase” or “if it actually disposes of all claims before the trial court”
• explaining that an order is final and appealable if it finally disposes of all parties and all claims
• explaining that, “[e]ven if he disagreed that the order was final,” plaintiff should have treated order “as though it was” final by seeking “an amended order” before trial court’s plenary power expired or by timely appeal
• explaining that, “[e]ven if he disagreed that the order was final,” plaintiff should have treated order “as though it was” final by seeking “an amended order” before trial court’s plenary power expired or by timely appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).