Skip to main content
· 11/23/1998

Garry Davis v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company

Citations

  • 160 F.3d 1023
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 29829
  • 1998 WL 808370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that party waived Batson challenge by failing to dispute 3 opposing party’s proffered reason for the peremptory strike
  • holding that “whether the party disputing the peremptory strikes has established a prima facie case of discrimination is moot, since Defendant voluntarily offered racially neutral reasons for its strikes”
  • holding that “whether the party disputing the peremptory strikes has established a prima facie case of discrimination is moot, since Defendant voluntarily offered racially neutral reasons for its strikes”
  • holding that “whether the party disputing the peremptory strikes has established a prima facie case of discrimination is moot, since Defendant voluntarily offered racially neutral reasons for its strikes”
  • holding party waived Batson challenge by failing to dispute opposing party’s proffered reason for peremptory strike
  • finding that the issue of “whether the party disputing the peremptory strikes has established a prima facie case” is moot when the opposing party “offers a race-neutral explanation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murnaghan, Hamilton, Magill, Eighth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.