Garrison v. Nicholson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board’s compliance with the notice portion of section 5103A is a factual inquiry
• holding that it is proper for this Court to review a Board finding that YA complied with the notice provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a) under a “clearly erroneous” standard of review
• holding that it is proper for this Court to review a Board finding that VA complied with the notice provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a) under a \clearly erroneous\ standard of review
• noting that Board determinations regarding compliance with VA's duty to notify are reviewed under the \clearly erroneous\ standard
• “[D]etermining compliance with [the duty to assist] is a fact issue.”
• “[D]etermining compliance with [the duty to assist] is a fact issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).