Skip to main content
· 7/1/1869

Garrison v. McGlockley

Citations

  • 38 Cal. 78
  • 1869 Cal. LEXIS 113

Syllabus

<p>Practice.—If the instructions of the Court below, to the jury, are not brought before the Supreme Court, they will be presumed to have been properly and rightly given.</p> <p>Idem.—When a question of fact, about which there was a direct and substantial conflict of evidence, has been submitted to a jury, under proper instructions of the Court, the verdict determines it, and this Court has uniformly declined to interfere with the verdict.</p> <p>Adverse Possession.—The cases of McOraclcen v. City of San Francisco (16 Cal. 591), and Kimball v. Lóhmas (31 Id. 151), as to what constitutes adverse possession, approved.</p>

Judges: Sprague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.