Garriott v. NCsoft Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an evidentiary objection raised for the first time in a motion for a new trial and not considered on its merits by the district court is not preserved and thus reviewed only for plain error
• “Courts look skeptically at such claims for a do-over, especially in the context of a jury verdict.”
• “A motion for a new trial or to amend a judgment cannot be used to raise arguments which could, and should, have been made before the judgment issued.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).