Skip to main content
· 10/23/2023

Garrett Wayne Whitten v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting Section 1441(d) “provides for removal” in a municipal tax lien case originally brought in state court
  • discussing “[t]he Tate Letter announc[ing] the United States’ decision to join the majority of other countries by adopting the ‘restrictive theory’ of sovereign immunity”
  • abrogating Seventh Circuit precedent that a minor guideline range error of six to twelve months was not prejudicial
  • noting our consistent practice of interpret- ing the FSIA in keeping with “international law at the time of the FSIA’s enactment” and looking to the contemporary Restatement for guidance
  • “In enacting the FSIA, Congress intended to codify the restrictive theory’s limitation of immunity to sovereign acts.”
  • “Under the FSIA, a foreign state is presumptively immune from suit unless a specific exception applies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.