Garrett v. Talladega County Drug & Violent Crime Task Force

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing plaintiff to inspect defendant’s computer system because plaintiff demonstrated “troubling discrepancies with respect to defendant’s document production”
• permitting plaintiff to mirror image defendant's computers in light of “troubling discrepancies with respect to defendant's document production”
• permitting plaintiff-to review the mirror image of defendant’s computers where there were “troubling discrepancies with respect to defendant’s document production”
• following basic structure for an independent expert paid by party requesting information to “mirror image” other party’s hard drives to identify deleted files, and following procedure set forth in Playboy Enterprises, Inc.
• allowing inspection where “troubling discrepancies” with respect to document production was demonstrated
• “[C]omputer records, including records that have been ‘deleted,’ are documents discoverable under Fed. R. Civ. P. 34.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).