Skip to main content
· 4/22/1992

Garrett v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Citations

  • 829 P.2d 713
  • 112 Or. App. 539
  • 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 780

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the court’s “function is to ascertain the meaning of language used and enforce it according to its legal effect”
  • “When a written contract refers in specific terms to another writing, the other writing is part of the contract.”
  • “When a written contract refers in specific terms to another writing, the other writing is part of the contract.”
  • “Contracts of insurance are like other written contracts in that the intention of the parties controls and when the language is plain and unambiguous, the intention of the parties is determined by the policy language.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Riggs, Edmonds

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.