Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/1/1998
Garrett v. State
Citations
- 720 A.2d 1193
- 124 Md. App. 23
- 1998 Md. App. LEXIS 195
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the burden is on the non-moving party to show that the other parties are not prejudiced
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Salmon, Adkins, Alpert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Department of Housing & Community Development v. MullenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-05· cited 15×
- First Wholesale Cleaners Inc. v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-28· cited 12×
- In re: M.C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-04-01· cited 2×
- Rohrbaugh v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-03-31
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. HicksCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-04-04· cited 44×
- Mattvidi Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Nationsbank of Virginia, N.A.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-04-07· cited 32×
- Noffsinger v. NoffsingerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-02-25· cited 27×
- Lake v. CallisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1953-07-09· cited 25×
- Daniels v. Superintendent, Clifton T. Perkins State HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-08· cited 16×
- Plummer v. WaskeyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-02-01· cited 14×
- Patapsco Associates Ltd. Partnership v. GuranyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-07-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.