Garrett v. Sam H. Goodman Bldg. Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[S]ummary disposition based on the 'open and obvious' doctrine was improper because neither defendant was the premises possessor.\
• “summary disposition based on the ‘open and obvious’ doctrine was improper because neither defendant was the premises possessor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).