Garrett v. Raytheon Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs claim of personal injury resulting from asbestos exposure accrued in 1972, and thus was time-barred in 1973
• noting that the statute of limitations in a medical-malpractice action begins to run regardless of whether the full amount of damage is apparent at the time of the first legal injury
• noting that the limitations period in a medical-malpractice action begins to run 13 SC-2025-0275 and SC-2025-0283 regardless of whether the full amount of the damage is apparent at the time of the first legal injury
• noting that the limitations period in a medical-malpractice action begins to run 13 SC-2025-0275 and SC-2025-0283 regardless of whether the full amount of the damage is apparent at the time of the first legal injury
• limiting recovery to the those acts that occurred within the limitations period
• tort action for personal injury, based on negligence, strict liability, extended manufacturers liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).