Garrett v. Hoffman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “numerous cases involving injunctive relief clearly establish that § 2283 proscribes restraints on the enforcement or execution of judgments”
• stating that avoiding potential conflicts between state and federal court judgments is “at least an implicit purpose of” the Anti-Injunction Act
• declaratory judgment should be barred only where judgment would lead to unseemly interference with state court litigation
• “The Declaratory Judgment Act does not come within the ‘expressly authorized’ exception”
• “[T]he Declaratory Judgment Act does not come within the ‘expressly authorized’ exception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).