Garrett v. Garrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting adequacy challenge based on effect of res judicata because abandoned claims would involve a different cause of action against a different defendant than that involved in the class action
• \The element of a duty to disclose in a fraudulent-suppression case is analogous to the element of reliance in a misrepresentation case.\ (citing Mack v. General 22 1120010; 1120114 Motors Acceptance Corp., 169 F.R.D. 671, 677 (M.D. Ala. 1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Caremark RX, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2006-10-20· cited 11×
• John Lauriello v. CVS Caremark Corporation
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2014-09-12· cited 6×
• Houston County Health Care Auth. v. Williams, 1021253 (Ala. 1-12-2007)
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2007-01-12· cited 1×
• Unnamed case
  Texas Supreme Court· 2007-03-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Union Springs Telephone Company v. Green
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1969-12-11· cited 39×
• Bailey v. City of Mobile
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1974-05-30· cited 23×
• Humphries v. Whiteley
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1990-04-06· cited 16×
• Vaughn v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1979-07-13· cited 13×