Garrett v. Flautt Properties

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding jurisdiction under § 1581(i) is improper because plaintiff could have filed a protest under § 1581(a) to challenge anticipated assessments
• jurisdiction under § 1581 (i) improper because plaintiff could have filed a protest under § 1581(a) to challenge anticipated assessments
• “Congress did not intend the Court of International Trade to have jurisdiction over appeals concerning completed transactions when the appellant had failed to utilize an avenue for effective protest before the Customs Service”
• “Congress did not intend the Court of International Trade to have jurisdiction over appeals concerning completed transactions when the appellant had failed to utilize an avenue for effective protest before the Customs Service.”
• “Congress did not intend the Court of International Trade to have jurisdiction over appeals concerning completed transactions when the appellant had failed to utilize an avenue for effective protest before the Customs Service”
• Congress did not intend the CIT to have jurisdiction over appeals concerning completed transactions when the appellant had failed to utilize an avenue for effective protest before the Customs Service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).