Skip to main content
· 11/20/2007

Garretson v. Post

Citations

  • 68 Cal. Rptr. 3d 230
  • 156 Cal. App. 4th 1508
  • 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that trial court's ruling on SLAPP motion is reviewed under de novo standard of review
  • finding notice of a nonjudicial foreclosure sale was not done in an official proceeding, but was “analogous to a business dealing or transaction”
  • explaining deficiency judgments are available in judicial foreclosures but not in non-judicial foreclosures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gaut

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.