Garnett v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing Section 111.11(a)(2); holding the Board did not err in hearing appeal that listed the challenged findings of fact and conclusions of law as the notice sufficiently stated the basis for appeal
• Employer’s notice of appeal to the Board sufficiently notified the Board and the claimant of the issues upon which the employer based its appeal even though the notice only listed by number the findings of fact and conclusions of law at issue in the case.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).